The Department of Homeland Security says it’s replacing its longstanding lottery system for H-1B work visas with an approach that prioritizes skilled, higher-paid foreign workers.
source
President Trump is spending this Christmas at his home in Florida, where he put out a flurry of social media posts overnight. Members of his team, meanwhile, are trying to find a solution to the war between Russia and Ukraine. Willie Inman has details.
source
Since returning to the White House in January, President Donald Trump has overturned decades of U.S. trade policy — building a wall of tariffs around what used to be a wide open economy.
His double-digit taxes on imports from almost every country have disrupted global commerce and strained the budgets of consumers and businesses worldwide. They have also raised tens of billions of dollars for the U.S. Treasury.
Trump has argued that his steep new import taxes are necessary to bring back wealth that was “stolen” from the U.S. He says they will narrow America’s decades-old trade deficit and bring manufacturing back to the country. But upending the global supply chain has proven costly for households facing rising prices. And the erratic way the president rolled out his tariffs — announcing them, then suspending or altering them before conjuring up new ones — made 2025 one of the most turbulent economic years in recent memory.
Here’s a look at the impact of Trump’s tariffs over the last year, in four charts.
A key number for the overall impact of tariffs on U.S. consumers and businesses is the “effective” tariff rate — which, unlike headline figures imposed by Trump for specific trade actions, provides an average based on the actual imports coming into the country.
In 2025, per data from the Yale Budget Lab, the effective U.S. tariff rate peaked in April. But it’s still far higher than the average seen at the start of the year. Before finalizing shifts in consumption, November’s effective tariff rate was nearly 17% — seven times greater than January’s average and the highest seen since 1935.
Among selling points to justify his tariffs, Trump has repeatedly said they would reduce America’s longstanding trade deficit and bring revenue into the Treasury.
Trump’s higher tariffs are certainly raising money. They’ve raked in more than $236 billion this year through November — much more than in years past. But they still account for just a fraction of the federal government’s total revenue. And they haven’t raised nearly enough to justify the president’s claim that tariff revenue could replace federal income taxes — or allow for windfall dividend checks for Americans.
The U.S. trade deficit, meanwhile, has fallen significantly since the start of the year. The trade gap peaked to a monthly record of $136.4 billion in March, as consumers and businesses hurried to import foreign products before Trump could impose his tariffs on them. The trade gap narrowed to $52.8 billion in September, the latest month for which data is available. But the year-to-date deficit was still running 17% ahead of January-September 2024.
Trump’s 2025 tariffs hit nearly every country in the world — including America’s biggest trading partners. But his policies have had the biggest impact on U.S. trade with China, once the biggest source of American imports and now No. 3 behind Canada and Mexico. U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports now come to 47.5%, according to calculations by Chad Bown of the Peterson Institute for International Economics.
The value of goods coming into the U.S. from China fell nearly 25% during the first three-quarters of the year. Imports from Canada also dropped. But the value of products from Mexico, Vietnam and Taiwan grew year-to-date.
For investors, the most volatile moments on the stock market this year arrived amid some of the most volatile moments for Trump’s tariffs.
The S&P 500, an index for the biggest public companies in the U.S., saw its biggest daily and weekly swings in April — and largest monthly losses and gains in March and June, respectively.
Need a recap of how Trump’s trade actions unfolded in 2025? See a timeline here.
By Rozanna Latiff
KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 26 (Reuters) – Malaysia’s influential former premier Najib Razak was jailed on Friday for a further 15 years and fined $2.8 billion for power abuse and money laundering in the biggest trial of the multibillion-dollar 1MDB scandal, a ruling that could have big political ramifications.
Malaysia and U.S. investigators say at least $4.5 billion was stolen from 1Malaysia Development Berhad, a state fund Najib co-founded in 2009 during the first of his nine years in power in the Southeast Asian country.
More than $1 billion allegedly made its way into accounts linked to 72-year-old Najib, who was first imprisoned in 2022 in another 1MDB case and has long insisted he has been made the scapegoat for Malaysia’s biggest-ever financial scandal.
During a verdict that took five hours to deliver, high court judge Collin Lawrence Sequerah said Najib’s contention that he was repeatedly deceived by others at 1MDB was implausible and to believe that would “stretch the imagination into the realms of pure fantasy”.
On a day of reckoning for arguably Malaysia’s most divisive politician Najib was found guilty of all four counts of abuse of power and all 21 money laundering charges, after a marathon legal battle that included multiple appeals and a partial royal pardon.
The judge handed down sentences of 15 years for each count of power abuse and five years for each money laundering charge, to be served concurrently, after his current jail term ends in 2028.
Najib was ordered to pay fines of 11.39 billion ringgit ($2.82 billion), and the court said 2.08 billion ringgit in assets must be recovered from him.
Failure to pay the fine or forfeit the assets would result in additional jail time, the court ruled.
‘COLD, HARD AND INCONTROVERTIBLE EVIDENCE’
“The contention by the accused that the charges against him were a witch hunt and politically motivated were debunked by the cold, hard and incontrovertible evidence against him that pointed towards the accused having abused his own powerful position in 1MDB, coupled with the extensive powers conferred upon him,” Sequerah said.
The ruling could fuel further tensions in Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s governing alliance, which includes the once dominant United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) party, over which Najib has retained significant influence even from jail.
Najib apologised last year for mishandling the scandal, saying he was misled by 1MDB officials and fugitive financier Jho Low about the source of the funds in his accounts.
Low, who was charged in the United States for his central role in the case, denies wrongdoing and his whereabouts are unknown.
Judge Sequerah said evidence revealed that Najib had an “unmistakable bond and connection” with Low, who acted as the then prime minister’s “proxy and intermediary” in 1MDB affairs.
“It must be appreciated that the accused…stood at the very apex of the decision-making process,” Sequerah said.
“To entertain the belief that officers subordinate to him in the hierarchy would willingly and knowingly conspire against a sitting prime minister … would be to stretch the imagination into the realms of pure fantasy.”
SUPERYACHT AND CELEBRITY PARTIES
Funds siphoned from 1MDB were used by the opulent-living Low and his associates to buy a trove of luxury assets from a private jet and a $120 million superyacht to hotels, artworks and jewelry, and to finance the 2013 Hollywood film “The Wolf of Wall Street”, U.S. lawsuits have said.
Savvy networker Low had high-profile international connections and famously attended lavish parties with A-List American celebrities, including actors and singers.
Najib, who sat with his head down and shoulders slumped at numerous times during the verdict reading, has maintained Low and other 1MDB officials made him believe funds deposited into his account were donations from the Saudi royal family.
But the judge dismissed that, saying Najib – the British-educated son of a former premier – was “no country bumpkin” and “of superior intelligence”.
He described the alleged donations as “implausible”, saying letters produced by Najib that allegedly originated from the Saudi royals were probably forgeries.
“The evidence pointed unmistakably to the fact that the monies were in fact derived from 1MDB funds,” Sequerah said.
TEST OF GOVERNMENT STABILITY
The verdict came just days after another court denied a bid by Najib to serve his existing jail sentence under house arrest after it was halved in 2024 to six years by a pardons board chaired by Malaysia’s former king.
The court’s rejection of Najib’s request reignited tensions within the ruling alliance, with some UMNO leaders expressing disappointment and others angered by celebratory social media posts by some members of Anwar’s coalition.
Najib’s UMNO campaigned against Anwar in a 2022 election but joined his coalition to form a government after the poll ended in a hung parliament. Anwar on Tuesday urged parties to accept the decision with “full patience and wisdom”.
The verdict is the culmination of a decade-long investigation by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission, which former government officials said was systematically obstructed by Najib’s administration while other countries the United States, Switzerland and Singapore made headway in their own 1MDB probes.
“The investigation was marked by significant legal, technical, and jurisdictional challenges,” MACC chief commissioner Azam Baki said after the verdict.
“This decision is neither a moment of celebration nor of personal pride. Rather, it reflects the fulfillment of our responsibility and duty to the nation”.
($1 = 4.0450 ringgit)
(Writing by Rozanna Latiff and Martin Petty; Editing by Kate Mayberry and Hugh Lawson)
Rescues underway as historic storms unleash flooding, mudslides across California; Holiday cookie box deliveries make spirits bright
source
It’s been a rollercoaster of a year for U.S. trade policy.
President Donald Trump launched a barrage of new tariffs in 2025, plunging the U.S. into trade wars with nearly every country in the world. Volley after volley of threats and steeper import taxes often arrived erratically — with Trump claiming that such levies needed to be immediately imposed to close trade imbalances and take back wealth that was “stolen” from the U.S.
But the president also turned to tariffs amid personal grudges, or in response to political critics. And the whiplash of on-again, off-again duties — and responding retaliation — fueled widespread uncertainty for businesses and consumers alike, all while households continue to face rising prices.
Here’s a summary of how Trump’s biggest trade actions unfolded over the last year, broken down by key months.
In his first few months back in office, Trump focuses his new tariffs on America’s three biggest trading partners: Canada, Mexico and China. On-again, off-again levies and responding retaliation begin to bubble up.
Worldwide, the U.S. also heightens import taxes on steel and aluminum to 25% — expanding Trump’s previously-imposed 2018 import taxes.
Trump’s trade wars escalate to new heights in April. The president unveils sweeping “Liberation Day” tariffs on almost every country in the world — sending the stock market tumbling. And more turbulence follows after he tells investors that it’s a “great time to buy” mere hours before postponing dozens of steeper import taxes.
China is the exception. Washington and Beijing trade more and more sky high, tit-for-tat levies — reaching 145% and 125%, respectively.
Separately, Trump’s 25% auto tariffs begin, plunging the industry into uncertainty and bringing more retaliation from trading partners like Canada.
The Trump administration spends much of the summer boasting about trade “framework” deals with countries like China, the U.K. and Vietnam. But his administration sends letters to dozens of other nations promising that heightened levies are on the way — and notably escalates trade wars with Brazil and India.
Otherwise, Trump continues to expand sector-specific tariffs, hiking steel and aluminum taxes to a punishing 50%.
Meanwhile, a key legal challenge over Trump’s tariffs gains traction. A federal court blocks Trump from imposing some of his most sweeping levies under an emergency-powers law — but an appeals court temporarily halts the order, allowing tariff collections to continue as the case wends through court.
Heightened U.S. tariffs on more than 60 countries and the European Union kick in. After several delays, most of these rates span from April’s “Liberation Day” — but separately, Trump hikes import taxes on Canada to 35%.
Punishing 50% levies on goods from Brazil and India also take effect, along with a new 50% rate on most imported copper worldwide. And low-value imports coming into the U.S. lose their duty-free status with the end of the “de minimis” rule.
Separately, the U.S. extends its trade truce with China. And a U.S. appeals court rules that Trump went too far when he declared national emergencies to justify his tariffs — but doesn’t strike them down entirely, allowing the administration to take its case to the Supreme Court.
The Trump administration officially takes its tariff fight to the Supreme Court. In initial oral arguments, the justices appear skeptical about the president’s authority to impose such sweeping levies.
Meanwhile, Trump continues to promise more sectoral tariffs — and 25% levies on kitchen cabinets and other furniture take effect. But other threats get delayed. Amid rising price pressures, the president also lowers or scraps a few previous tariffs, notably for goods like beef and fruit. He also suggests that Americans will receive a $2,000 dividend from new tariff revenue — but details remain very scarce.
Abhi Ramesh launched Misfits Market in 2018, an online grocery store that buys rejected produce from farmers and packages it for sale across the country. Skyler Henry reports.
source
MOSCOW, Dec 26 (Reuters) – A court in Moscow sentenced former Russian foreign ministry employee Arseniy Konovalov to 12 years in prison for passing secrets to U.S. intelligence, Interfax reported on Friday citing The Russian Federal Security Service (FSB).
Konovalov, “while on a long-term foreign assignment in the United States, … passed secret information that had come to his knowledge in the course of his duties in return for monetary reward on to American intelligence,” the agency reported citing FSB.
(Reporting by Reuters; Writing by Anastasia Teterevleva; editing by Guy Faulconbridge)
Over the last 24 hours, some parts of Southern California have broken daily rainfall records that they haven’t seen in more than 50 years. Andres Gutierrez reports and Andrew Kozak has the forecast.
source
